Al Gore makes embarrassing mistake by severely misstating sea ice loss prediction

Posted: 12/15/2009 by Lynn Dartez in 2011
December 14, 8:10 PMClimate Change ExaminerTony Hake
Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore gestures as he joins cabinet ministers from Nordic countries for discussion on Greenland's ice sheet at the UN Climate summit in Copenhagen, Denmark, Monday, Dec. 14, 2009.  During the conference, Gore severely overstated the potential for Arctic sea ice loss.  (AP Photo/Anja Niedringhaus)
Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore gestures as he joins cabinet
ministers from Nordic countries for discussion on Greenland’s ice
sheet at the UN Climate summit in Copenhagen, Denmark,
Monday, Dec. 14, 2009.  During the conference, Gore severely
overstated the potential for Arctic sea ice loss.
(AP Photo/Anja Niedringhaus)

Maybe Al Gore should have stayed home from the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. Having been shown to being prone to taking liberty with the facts, Gore once again did so by claiming that a computer model determined that there was a 75 percent chance the Arctic would be ice-free in five years. A dire prediction indeed – if it were true.

In his speech at the summit today, the former vice president Nobel Laureate and Danish ice scientist Dorthe Dahl Jens presented two slideshows to a packed audience at the Bella Center. The team discussed the loss of sea ice and the danger it presents from rising sea levels.

Gore told the audience, “These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 per cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years.”

Those estimates far exceed even the direst predictions of climate scientists and set the room abuzz. The most often cited figure and the one used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns of a loss of sea ice by 2030.

Get the latest from the Climate Change Examiner

Complete coverage of the UN Climate Change Conference

Climategate – All the latest developments

Complete climate change coverage from Examiner.com

Climate Change Examiner Facebook Page

Climate Change Examiner on Twitter

Or be notified by email when a new article from the Climate Change Examiner is posted.  Click the ‘Subscribe’ link at the top or bottom of the article and enter your email address.

“It is hard to capture the astonishment that the experts in the science of ice felt when they saw this,” Gore said.

Not only were the ‘experts in the science of ice’ astonished, so too was Dr. Maslowski, the scientist whose models supposedly came up with the five to seven year figure.

Maslowski told the UK Times, “It’s unclear to me how this figure was arrived at. I would never try to estimate likelihood at anything as exact as this.”

Other climate scientists and ice experts immediately disavowed Gore’s claims. Mark Serreze of the US National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colorado told the Associated Press, “It’s possible but not likely. We’re sticking with 2030.”

Mr. Gore’s office was quick to start damage control. The Times reported his office said it was a “ballpark figure” that Dr. Maslowski used in a conversation several years ago.

As one of the most visible – and divisive – figures in the debate about manmade climate change, the former vice president’s every word is watched closely. His movie “An Inconvenient Truth” was found by a British High Court to contain 11 significant errors and his recently released follow on book, “Our Choice” had errors and impossibilities on the cover.

In February his standard presentation depicted “weather related disasters that are completely unprecedented.” He was however forced to yank the slide when the assertion was proven false. Appearing on the Tonight Show last month, he said the core of the Earth was “several million degrees”, a temperature warmer than the surface of the sun. When asked about the Climategate email scandal last week, he stated that “the most recent one is more than 10 years old” when in fact some of the emails were sent as recently as October.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. Longknife 21 says:

    Dave,
    WTF is the Sons of Silence? 1% means what? Bunny-rabbit buggerers? I’m not registering in the guest-book of what looks like the “Budwieser” Motor-Cycle Club! They need to put more info on their site page, too many whack-os got my email already. Any of them get busted, and my file gets another page at DHS! They already gotta carry it in a milk crate!
    Just trying to save some trees! LMAO!

  2. Longknife 21 says:

    Al Gore ’embarrassed’? Hardly, nothing embarrasses this clown! He hasn’t told the truth about this (or much of anything else) in 20 years!
    Pure-T lies built on falsefied data! Should be prosecuted.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s