Archive for 01/11/2010

Wh order

We have suffered another devastating attack on American security by the most secretive and opaque President we have ever had the misfortune to elect.

While Obama and his gang of thieves hide behind closed doors to pass secret, enslaving legislation under the Stalin- like propaganda chimera of “reform,” he has opened the floodgates to a veritable treasure trove of intel to our mortal enemies.

On December 29th, and very much under the radar, (he was sunnin’ and funnin’ in Hawaii at the time), Obama declassified just about everything he possibly could to help foreign governments and his Communist-Socialist US conspirators to overthrow America.

This executive order is a tsunami info dump of newly declassified (ca. pre-June 29, 1985 classified) data. It is about to be dumped, with endangerment to US National Security and respective agencies at highest levels. Info dump commences 180 days from signing of the Executive Order.

Imagine, we can’t see health care legislation but our enemies can see ……….. all.

Huge shout out to Brian for going through the documents and alerting me to this breach of national security. It is the act of a traitor, an enemy in the White House. Clearly a gift to our enemies and fodder for a treasonous press.

Imagine such an action at a time of war.

Here is the HSS Energy page announcement, and then the White House announcement below. Links to both are provided.


On December 29, 2009, President Obama signed Executive Order (E.O.) 13526 on Classified National Security Information. The new E.O. is posted on the White House website: and supersedes E.O. 12958, as amended.

As in the past, the new order in no way affects Restricted Data (RD) or Formerly Restricted Data (FRD) information which is classified under the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) and not under the E.O.. The E.O. specifically excludes RD and FRD information from its regulation.

As the President promised, this E.O. is designed to both reduce the amount of information initially classified, avoid overclassification, and raise the standards for what information can remain classified beyond its initial period, usually 25 years. The new E.O. was drafted in an interagency setting and used input from the public and from the Public Interest Declassification Board.

With the new E.O. signed, a new implementing regulation for the E.O. will be issued by the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) within 180 days and in turn DOE must update its implementing directive to be in compliance.

Here are some changes from the new E.O. that will have an impact on DOE’s classification program:

§ When determining to originally classify information, if there is significant doubt about the need to classify the information, it shall not be classified.

§ If there is significant doubt about the appropriate level of classification, information shall be classified at the lower level.

§ DOE will be required to complete a fundamental classification guidance review for NSI within 2 years of the effective date of the Order. This fundamental review will be led by the Office of Technical Guidance (HS-92) and will involve classification authorities and subject matter experts throughout the complex. This effort will evaluate whether information currently classified as NSI in our guidance should remain classified under this new E.O.

§ Derivative classification authorities must be trained every 2 years. If not completed, then the derivative classification authority must normally be suspended. [Note: We will be examining this requirement against our 3-year training cycle and looking at how we can minimize the impact to the field.] Original classification authorities must complete annual training. If not completed, then the original classification authority will be suspended.

§ Information in permanently historically valuable records exempted from automatic declassification at 25 years must be declassified at 50 years unless it concerns: a confidential human source, a human intelligence source, or key design concepts of weapons of mass destruction. There are exceptions to this rule and a process identified to extend classification in extreme cases. However, the general idea is that most information should be declassified at 50 years.

§ A new National Declassification Center (NDC) will be established to streamline declassification processes, facilitate quality-assurance measures, and implement standardized training regarding the declassification of records determined to have permanent historical value. Another important aspect of its mission will be to handle referred records. This is already a major effort for Office of Document Reviews (HS-93) at the National Archives and we support the new center and its focus on the review of millions of pages of records in an improved efficient and streamlined process. The President has committed the NDC to process over 400 million records by 2013 and so this center will be very large scale in nature.

§ A new paragraph has been inserted in this new E.O. at DOE’s request. It states: ” The Secretary of Energy shall determine when information concerning foreign nuclear programs that was removed from the Restricted Data category in order to carry out provisions of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, may be declassified. Unless otherwise determined, such information shall be declassified when comparable information concerning the United States nuclear program is declassified.” This paragraph is focused on foreign nuclear program information that was transclassified under section 142(e) of the AEA and protected as NSI. We have always had a fundamental equity to ensure this information is not declassified ahead of similar RD information. This new paragraph makes clear that other agencies must seek DOE declassification guidance for such information.

In addition, here are highlights of other changes to the new Order:

§ The Order is effective 180 days from the date of issuance, except for sections 1.7, 3.3, and 3.7, which are effective immediately.

§ The definition of “weapons of mass destruction” has been changed. [Note: For the purposes of the Order, this definition relates only to NSI.]

§ For information in records determined not to have permanent historical value, the duration of classification beyond 25 years shall be the same as the disposition (destruction) date of the records, although it may be extended if the records are retained beyond their disposition date for business reasons.

§ Delegations of original classification authority shall be reported to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO).

§ Classified information originating in one agency may be disseminated to another agency or U.S. entity by any agency to which it has been made available without the consent of the originating agency unless the originating agency has determined that prior authorization is required for such dissemination and has marked or indicated such requirement on the medium containing the classified information in accordance with implementing directives issued pursuant to this order. [Note – Documents created prior to the effective date of this Order shall not be disseminated outside any other agency to which they have been made available without the consent of the originating agency.]

§ Classified information originating in one agency may be disseminated by any other agency to which it has been made available to a foreign government in accordance with statute, this order, directives implementing this order, direction of the President, or with the consent of the originating agency.

§ The Director of National Intelligence, as head of the Intelligence Community, will determine which information concerning intelligence sources, methods, and activities to declassify or downgrade for the Intelligence Community and will issue any necessary directives.

§ Classified, nonrecord materials will be declassified as soon as the information contained therein no longer meets the standards for classification.

§ The standards for exempting information from automatic declassification at 25 years have been strengthened.

§ Criteria for reclassifying information that has been released to the public under proper authority have been strengthened.

§ Authorized holders of classified information may challenge the classification of information originated by another agency. (unquote)



Atlas Shrugs


RantForAmerica Call To Patriots

Posted: 01/11/2010 by Lynn Dartez in 2011

Columbia University On Trial For Treason

Posted: 01/11/2010 by Lynn Dartez in Dr. Manning


Posted: 01/11/2010 by Lynn Dartez in Christian

In the year 2009, the Lord came unto Noah,
Who was now living in England and said:
“Once again, the earth has become wicked and over-populated, and I see the end of all flesh before me.”
“Build another Ark and save 2 of every living thing
Along with a few good humans.”
He gave Noah the blueprints, saying:
“You have 6 months to build the Ark before I will
Start the unending rain for 40 days and 40 nights.”

Six months later, the Lord looked down and saw Noah
Weeping in his yard – but no Ark.
“Noah!,” He roared, “I’m about to start the rain!
Where is the Ark?”
“Forgive me, Lord,” begged Noah, “but things have changed.”

“I needed a Building Permit.”

“I’ve been arguing with the Boat Inspector
About the need for a sprinkler system.”

“My neighbours claim that I’ve violated the
Neighbourhood Bye-Laws by building the Ark in my
Back garden and exceeding the height limitations. We had to go to the Local Planning Committee for a decision.”

“Then the Local Council and the Electricity Company demanded a shed load of money for the future costs of moving power lines and other overhead obstructions, to clear the Passage for the Ark’s move to the sea. I told them that the sea would be coming to us, but they would hear nothing of it.”

“Getting the wood was another problem. There’s a ban
On cutting local trees in order to save the Greater Spotted Barn Owl.”
“I tried to convince the environmentalists that I
Needed the wood to save the owls – but no go!”

“When I started gathering the animals the RSPCA took me to court. They insisted that I was confining wild animals against their will. They argued the accommodations were too restrictive, and it was cruel and inhumane to put so many animals in a confined space.”

“Then the Environmental Agency ruled that I couldn’t build the Ark until they’d conducted an environmental impact study on your proposed flood.”

“I’m still trying to resolve a complaint with the
Human Rights Commission on how many minorities I’m
Supposed to hire for my building crew.”

“Immigration are checking the Visa status of most of the people who want to work.”

“The trades unions say I can’t use my sons. They
Insist I have to hire only Union workers with
Ark-building experience.”

“To make matters worse, the Inland Revenue seized all my assets, claiming I’m trying to leave the country illegally With endangered species.”

“So, forgive me, Lord, but it would take at least 10
Years for me to finish this Ark.”

“Suddenly the skies cleared, the sun began to shine,
And a rainbow stretched across the sky.”

Noah looked up in wonder and asked,
“You mean you’re not going to destroy the world?”

“No,” said the Lord. “The Government beat me to it.”

Citizens who support Prop. 8 must defend Constitution because attorney general refuses

Posted: January 09, 2010
10:15 pm Eastern

By Drew Zahn
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

California Attorney General Jerry Brown

In a case with implications for the entire country, California’s Proposition 8 defining marriage as between one man and one woman goes on trial Monday with only private citizens speaking up for the voter-passed constitutional amendment – because state officials have refused to defend it.

Much is riding on the case of Perry vs. Schwarzenegger, for the lawsuit is petitioning a federal court to overturn not just a law, but a constitutional amendment passed by the people and affirmed by the state’s Supreme Court. A victory for same-sex marriage advocates in the case could set a precedent for federal courts to overturn every law and amendment in the country currently protecting the traditional definition of marriage.

And yet, though Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and California Attorney General Jerry Brown are named as defendants in the suit, both have refused to act in defense of the amendment, leaving it up to the people of California to take a stand for their constitution on their own.

Now hear this! ‘Marketing of Evil’ audiobook! Listen to David Kupelian read his controversial culture-war best-seller

In June, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California verified Brown’s abandonment of the case and therefore permitted quick-acting attorneys from the Alliance Defense Fund on behalf of, the group that sponsored the amendment campaign, to intervene in the case and take up defense where Brown refused.

At the time, ADF-allied attorney Andrew Pugno stated, “This ruling designating us to defend Proposition 8 reflects the unfortunate fact that, if left up to state officials, the will of the people would not be defended at all.”

“This case is as much about whether our government is of, by, and for the people as it is about marriage,” ADF Senior Counsel Brian Raum said in a statement released this week. “Just imagine how it would change our democracy if every state constitutional amendment could be eliminated by small groups of wealthy activists. It would no longer be America, but a tyranny of elitists.”