A Critical Decision

Posted: 03/17/2010 by Lynn Dartez in military


by Michael Gaddy
by Michael Gaddy
Recently by Michael Gaddy: Battle Rifle Basics

Members of all branches of the United States Military will soon be facing a most critical decision. A report emerged that Obama is using the deployment of additional troops to Afghanistan to cover for the movement of some 200,000 troops, presently on duty in countries other than Iraq and Afghanistan, to USNORTHCOM to prepare for the “expected outbreak of Civil War within the United States before the end of winter.”

It would appear those who call themselves “public servants” believe the people they supposedly serve have become dissatisfied with their job performance and will resort to some form of civil disobedience, which will necessitate military intervention. According to the article, Obama believes the reason for this civil unrest to be an expected “implosion” of this country’s financial systems. Should these events occur, members of the military would be forced to decide whether they would support their government, which gave hundreds of billions to government cronies in the financial sector, or their country.

A prudent man would speculate if the government so fears coming civil unrest, will they move to seize firearms throughout the country and use these military forces along with law enforcement to do so? I believe the answer can be found in the events surrounding the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Government forces there not only seized firearms from private citizens but also relocated many citizens against their will.

Millions of Americans have prayed for the safety of the military as they fight the government’s wars all over the planet. Many believe the military to be defending the country from enemies that would take our weapons and our freedoms. What will their actions be when the US military becomes that enemy? Will the military willingly participate in such acts? Such are questions the future holds.

The government has spent decades defining those who oppose its unlawful exploits as enemies of the state. Those who can or will not differentiate between the government and the country have fallen hook, line and sinker for this demonization of those who demand the government operate within the constraints of the Constitution and moral law. Most of those who blindly support the illegal actions of the government have been bought and paid for with the taxes of those who actually produce something. Unfortunately, primary among those bought-and-paid-for entities are law enforcement and the military.

Both political parties have conducted this demonization of true Patriots. While the democrats have been traditionally anti-gun and liberty, the republicans bought into the program with the fascist Patriot Act and the illegal, unconstitutional War on Terror. The two dominant political parties in this country are two wings of the same vulture: blatant in-your-face socialism. There are no answers to our problems to be found in either political party.

Many on the right have bought into the ideas expressed by leaders of the military that all who oppose the state and its illegal agenda should be treated no differently than the “insurgents” the military has been facing in Iraq and Afghanistan. Nowhere is that better illustrated than here where a law enforcement publication is advocating military tactics promoted by General David Petraeus be used against those whom the state defines as its enemies. While the article in Guns and Weapons for Law Enforcement speaks specifically of gangs and drug activity, don’t forget the Department of Homeland Security has defined millions of patriotic Americans and veterans as possible domestic terrorists in its report sent to LE agencies on April 7th of 2009. If you wonder if you fit the definition of possible domestic terrorist, you should check here.

If the report is correct and Obama is moving to strengthen USNORTHCOM with anywhere near the numbers mentioned, indicates the fedgov fears its own citizens much more than it fears al Qaeda. Either the government is anticipating a total financial breakdown, there are plans to confiscate firearms, a new false flag event is in the works, or any combination of the three. Either way, they plan on this event occurring before spring of 2010.

On the minds of many Americans and politicians is exactly how will the military and law enforcement react if told to confiscate firearms or move American citizens to FEMA camps.

Consideration must be given to the militarization of law enforcement entities in this country over the past few decades and our gradual decline into a police state, thanks to the bogus War on Terror. That being said, some police blogs such as this one indicate not all law enforcement personnel are on board with these illegal and corrupt practices. When considering possible actions of military personnel one must be aware of the felons and gang members who became part of the military when recruiters were falling short of their goals. Nothing could be better for a felon or a gang-banger than to actually be ordered to commit crimes with impunity. At some point in time, any true American serving in the military will be forced to ask themselves exactly what and whom they are defending and exactly what became of the “home of the free?”

What will be the reaction of the soldier from Colorado who is confiscating guns and placing so-called domestic terrorists in detention camps in Ohio when he gets word other soldiers are doing the same to his family and friends back home? Who will soldiers and law enforcement officers side with when push comes to shove: the government who has given over a trillion dollars to their cronies in the financial industry, failed to provide their brother/sister veterans competent medical care, denied disability benefits, denied compensation for treatment as prisoners of war, placed single parents in confinement and taken their children, or their family and friends who have lost their jobs and are seeing their homes and farms foreclosed by the same bankers who received huge bonuses from the bailout money? If military and law enforcement personnel begin to side with the citizens, will the fedgov call in United Nations forces to subdue those who cherish personal freedom and will fight to retain it?

Regardless of which series of events occur, Americans will be the losers. Brace yourselves and prepare, this is going to get real ugly.

December 7, 2009

Michael Gaddy [send him mail], an Army veteran of Vietnam, Grenada, and Beirut, lives in the Four Corners area of the American Southwest.

Copyright © 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

The Best of Michael Gaddy

Advertisements
Comments
  1. Longknife 21 says:

    America is a political powder-keg right now. An attempt at gun confiscation would be an excellent fuse.
    I believe the ‘200,000 troops’ is either propaganda, or people in the Obama admin have little idea of the true military strength. The authorized strength of the US Army is about 535,000, They are stretched so thin that they are using National Guard and ‘Contractors’ in Iraq and Afganistan. Perhaps 200,000 are techies, paper shufflers, B-B stackers, bean-counters, medical support, supply, transport, & other assorted REMFs that cannot be used as combat effectives. Of the other combat arms- armor and artillery will be prohibited from use domestically unless they are losing badly. Only the Infantry can be used effectively.
    Also National Guard troops may be used effectively to control rioting in the cities, but will most probably will refuse to confiscate guns in a suburban or rural area. Furthermore, many of the regular Army will refuse also, the percentage is arguable, but will be 1/3 to 2/3 depending upon the conditions. Many in the military see Obama as a much greater threat to America than rural civilians.
    So, to reach the 200,000 number they must:
    1. Greatly expand the “military” – arm the ObamaCorp? Street-gangs?
    2. Change MOSs involuntarily to beef up the Infantry – even from other Services – Navy, Air Force.
    3. Accelerate the Iraq (and Afghanistan) withdrawal
    4. Federalize the National Guard, disband units and assign personnel piecemeal to trusted Army units.
    Any of these actions will greatly increase the dissatifaction in the Army and lead to morale, retainment, and recruitment problems.
    If they obtain the 200,000 troop level, if evenly distributed throughout the states that gives 4000 troops per State. They won’t be dispersed like that, but in many areas they won’t have sufficient troops to protect their own weapons and supply from enterprising militia.
    A recognized fact of Guerrilla war, is that it take 10 occupying troops per guerilla for the occupiers to win. The guerrilla only needs to survive. There are 30-50 million potential militia here, mostly in rural areas. The numbers simply do not work for the Obamunists, and the Military leaders know it. If they used half their troops operationally (100,000) it would only take 10,000 resisters to wear them down from a potential local pool of several million potential resisters (gunowners unwilling to surrender their lawful property). The first real battle will cause mass desertions in the military.
    Their greatest General, Yamamoto, told the Japanese General Staff that it was impossible to invade the United States because, “There will be an American with a rifle behind every blade of grass.” And that was with 45% of todays population and now we are much better armed.

  2. tuxkabin says:

    So “The Southern View”

  3. tuxkabin says:

    I purchased a book through the League of the south web site.
    It is titled (Abraham Lincoln)
    “The Soutnern View”
    Demythologizing America’s Sixteenth President.
    IF you should decide to read the true story about Lincoln then you will see every step that Obama has done and will be taking.
    Sea raven Press.com out of Franklin Tennessee.
    It is the most interesting book ever read by me, and I have never read a Fiction book in my life nor will I ever.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s