Archive for 04/05/2010

(Ret.) Lt. Col. Walter Francis Fitzpatrick is now a political prisoner in the Monroe County Sheriffs Jail and has been since 04/01/2010. This Court is now the poster child for political corruption and Mr. Fitzpatrick has made a gallant effort to expose this abomination. They are operating outside their own rule of law.

Latest YouTube video can be found here–

And here (with explanations) —
Please make sure everyone you know is aware of this situation and ask for those that can, to meet me at this Courthouse on Wed.

04/07/2010 at 0900 hrs.
Tea Party and 912 Patriots welcome, Resist net, C2C, Well regulated Militia, Oath Keepers, all need to spread the word that our battle against tyranny has a new ground Zero— Madisonville, TN.

See you there on Wed.

Carl Swensson

These are the documents that were filed with the Clerk of Court in Monroe County, TN and used to attempt the arrest of those so noted.

Clerk refused to issue Arrest Warrants but stamped his Docs. as having been received.


If at First You Don’t Succeed Barry, Lie, Lie Again

Posted: 04/05/2010 by Lynn Dartez in CFP

By Jayme Evans  Sunday, April 4, 2010

“Part of the undertow in the coming election is going to be, uh, President Obama’s leadership. And the Republicans would make a case, and a lot of Independents will buy this argument, listen, he just hasn’t been, I mean look at the health care bill, his number one priority and it took him forever to get it through and he had to compromise it to death and a version of… listen, he’s a nice person and he’s very articulate, this is what’s going to be used against him, but he couldn’t sell watermelons if you gave him a state trooper and he lied down in traffic.” 3/7/10 – Disgraced ex-journalist Dan Rather speculating on what a failure to pass health care legislation would mean for Obama.

In the wake of their arguably “successful” and overwhelmingly unpopular government takeover of the US health care system, which also succeeded in hopelessly dividing the entire country, you’d think that if Barack Obama and Democrats were interested at all in governing, rather than enslaving us through a Chicago-style dictatorship, they’d tone down their rhetorical attacks just a bit. But, recent events indicate they have no intention of doing so and that the attacks are increasing.

Since his campaign, Democrats have tried on several occasions to label opposition to specific Obama policy decisions as the unfortunate by-product of vehement, deep-seated racism. These baseless accusations have continued to surface every so often, whenever Democrats feel vulnerable. And, as the debate over health care wore on, it became increasingly clear that, although they may win the policy fight, Democrats already lost the debate long ago. So, the racist attacks began.

First, they manufactured that pathetic spectacle for the cameras where black House Democrats marched arm-in-arm with Nancy Pelosi to the capitol, through jeering crowds, trying to equate protesters of her trillion-dollar lies and chicanery with the turbulence of the African-American struggle for equality back in the 1960s.

Then there was the incident where Rep. Emanuel Cleaver was allegedly spat on. Although dissenting opinions abound, the video that I saw never showed him immediately wipe someone else’s saliva from his face, glasses or anywhere else, as one instinctively would if they were spat upon intentionally. What I saw was the Congressman react by ducking his head when an angry protester cupped his hands and yelled at the top of his lungs mere inches from his ear as well as a female police officer and then, when he realized a camera was rolling, pretend to wipe something off of his face.

Although his election was a numerical impossibility without white, independent voters, Slanderer-In-Chief Barack Obama is unfortunately not above the fray, having recently engaged in a bit of race-baiting himself. Cognizant of how angry the electorate was after they were forced to accept his un-Constitutional expansion of federal power, he embarked on a slew of campaign stops that were ostensibly designed to convince skeptical Americans of the merits of ObamaCare. What we got instead were more taunts, insults and attacks from the bully pulpit, with Obama daring opponents to repeal the legislation and mocking those who believe that he pledged to uphold the US Constitution instead of wiping with it after Chris Matthews is done kissing his behind.

Matthews continues to attribute racist motives to Constitutional conservatives who oppose Obama, yet he couldn’t even feign surprise during his March 7, 2010 show when disgraced ex-journalist Dan Rather opined that Obama”Couldn’t sell watermelons if you gave him a state trooper and he lied(sic) down in traffic.”

Mr. Obama has also given interviews of late, characterizing those who oppose his policies as racist, conspiracy nuts who actually oppose him because of his skin color (which I’d like to remind you is half-white) or because (according to Obama) he wasn’t born in this country, a blatant misrepresentation of the argument made by so-called “birthers” about his eligibility. As one of those so-called birthers, I question, not whether Barack Obama was born in the US, but whether his birth, wherever that was, qualifies him as a “natural-born” US citizen, as only “natural born” citizens qualify to be president.

Not content with a few cheap shots, Obama and Democrats have now embarked on a smear campaign the likes of which we’ve never seen. Anyone who questions Obama’s motives or agenda, anyone who is associated with the Tea Party movement and anyone who disapproves of his installation of a socialist dictatorship with its “carrot and stick” approach is to be labeled as a violent racist.

Democrats seem to be operating on the premise that if you can’t silence the message, just shoot the messenger. Unfortunately for them, there are simply too many Paul Reveres this time. Too many voices to silence and too many Americans who still believe in their Constitution to allow this garbage to continue. I’m not shutting up, I’m not intimidated by a deaf congress, executive thuggery, or baseless charges of racism. I can articulate specific socialist policy decisions I disagree with and which provisions of our founding documents these policies violate. And my voice, along with millions of others, will be heard louder than ever in November. Until then, if you have any concrete evidence that my opposition to Obama’s objectionable policies is based on anything other than his Marxism, then put it out there for the world to see. Otherwise, I suggest you shut your pie hole.


Posted: 04/05/2010 by Lynn Dartez in Land of The Free

By Timothy N. Baldwin, JD.
April 2, 2010

Mainstream media has recently reported the story of the alleged “Militia” group in Michigan which supposedly had plans of killing police officers as a sort of “freedom task”–in the name of Jesus Christ no less. In reality, “This is a group that [is] neither a militia [n]or a Christian group.”[1] This is not the first highlight of news where the media has misused the concept of a “militia” as a representation of everything evil and insane. Virtually every mainstream reference of “militia” today implicates terrorism, anti-American and wacko-extremists–right along with those Al Qaeda terrorists who are attempting to destroy America just because “we are free.”

From 1776 to 2010, the concept of a militia has been turned completely on its head. What was once seen as a necessary component of maintaining and protecting freedom against attacks by a tyrannical domestic government is now seen as a disgusting roach that must be stomped out of existence. Am I suggesting that some of these people who would classify themselves as a “militia” group are legitimately sound and constitute the real purpose of a militia? No. Just as I do not suggest that doctors who perform abortions upon the mother’s mere “choice” constitute actual doctors whose first purpose of treatment is to “do no harm.” We all know that a few people can give a bad name to the rest. What I am talking about here is manipulation to further enslave the people of the States, and empower those who control the federal government and global agenda.

There is without doubt a push and agenda by elitists, major media, politicians, and revolutionaries (who despise the ideals held by our founding generation) against the concept of a Second Amendment militia–one whose purpose is to provide for the protection of freedom within the state by citizens of that state: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”[2]

Particularly, in context of this amendment, the ratifiers were sure to express that militias were to secure a free “State” (singular)–not a free “United States” (plural). Those who attempt to strip the significance and application of militias by replacing “militia” with the “U.S. military” are, quite frankly, ignorant of America’s history and constitutional government or are deceitful and manipulative for a certain agenda. As expressed throughout the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, the people were more scared of a standing U.S. military than they were the U.S. Supreme Court.

To our founding generation, the importance of a well-regulated militia could not have been overstated or overrated. Indeed, the existence and maintenance of well-regulated militias were not only recognized as being necessary for a “free State,” as expressed in the second amendment, but also were considered a duty of each State:

“The roots of [the Second Amendment] strike down in to the past until they reach the Assize of Arms of Henry II (1181), whereby the old constitutional force was reorganized by the duty being imposed upon every free man, for the defense of the state, to provide himself arms according to his means.”[3]

Of course, the underlying presumption and foundation for the implementation of well-regulated militias was the evil inherent in human nature–particularly those who possess political power. They recognized that these militias would not only serve a practical effect of resistance against tyrants, but also a mental effect of inhibition.

The founding generation had personally experienced the efforts of Great Britain to disarm the people of the colonies. They knew the potential reality that government would attempt to disarm the people and eliminate the militias so that the people would be good little subjects to the government. To tyrants, obedience is all that is required to be a good citizen.

Founding Father George Mason’s daughter described this American experience and observed the evil of “gradual slavery” perpetrated by “their” government in Great Britain. She says:

“When the resolution of enslaving America was formed in Great Britain, the British Parliament was advised by an artful man [Sir William Keith] who was governor of Pennsylvania, to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them; but that they should not do it openly, but weaken them, and let them sink gradually, by totally disusing and neglecting the militia.”[4]

Not much has changed since 1775 and 1776, because human nature never changes. So, it is no wonder why the second amendment was insisted upon, such that the federal government had no power to forbid militias or prevent the armament of the people of the States. Militias were in fact what stood between freedom and tyranny, in the minds of our founding generation.


Acknowledging the existence and strength of the citizens’ militia in 1787, Alexander Hamilton even found it hard to believe that the federal government would ever usurp power not granted to it by the people of the States because of well-regulated militias (one of the presumptions for the states ratifying the constitution). Hamilton observes: “dangers [from the federal government] so formidable can[not] assail the whole Union…if we take into our view the aid to be derived from the militia.”[5]

Compare today, where anyone who suggests that the states need well-regulated militias strong enough to defend their state from the potential of U.S. military force would be labeled as a terrorist or extremist and would perhaps end up in prison like these arrested in Michigan. Like Sir William Keith, who betrayed the freedom of the colonists for the sake of empowering Great Britain, there are betrayers, instigators and propagators doing the federal government’s bidding today.

Understanding how this agenda has been successful is no wonder. Consider the sources used and implemented by the media, law enforcement and the federal government concerning militias and other “hate groups”: sources that are proposed as being “credible,” like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which allegedly “monitors hate groups and other fringe organizations.”[6] Advocacy groups like this are the same groups which feed information to fusion centers throughout American concerning “hate groups,” and these fusion centers are the same governmental agencies that create reports such as the highly-suspect “MIAC” report, which suggested that supporters of Chuck Baldwin, Ron Paul and Bob Barr should be watched closely as potential terrorists.[7]

And so the manipulation takes hold into every fabric of society. This understanding is easy enough to grasp considering that millions of American do very little independent thinking (if at all); do very little or no study concerning principles of freedom and American and world history (and I’m not talking about books written by Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and the like); conduct little or no research of their own concerning what they hear on CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, etc. When Americans hear a story about a crazy “militia” group in Michigan and then hear a fusion center report about Chuck Baldwin, Ron Paul or Bob Barr being leaders of terrorist mentality, they easily make the logical leap: militia equals bad; Chuck Baldwin equals bad; Ron Paul equals bad; firearms equal bad; state sovereignty equals bad. Don’t even suggest to them that a State actually maintain a well-regulated militia for second amendment purposes!

These tactics of delusion and manipulation are obvious and their purposes are known. They go right along with the agenda to strip this country, these states and these people of all effective and meaningful means by which independence, self-government, limited government, constitutional government, state sovereignty, individual sovereignty, and natural rights and freedom are secured.

So, what is the effect of this purpose-driven manipulation? I recently had a person email me in response to my article, “National ID: Who Will Resist?” in context of this recent Michigan “militia” arrest story. In his email, he expresses his trepidation of the federal government as a result of their prosecuting this alleged “militia” group, saying: “Are you kidding? Resist that? You will lose….Find a different way.” And so the federal government parades: Goal accomplished! Thankfully, not everyone thinks this way.

Let us theorize for a moment: what if a state revives a state militia, for the sole and expressed purposes of defending that state against foreign and domestic tyranny and usurpations, as expressed in the second amendment? What if three-fourths of the states deny this state the right of protecting its freedom, independence and sovereignty through a well-regulated militia? What if the federal government attempts to shut the militia operation down and criminally prosecutes those participating?

As I have repeatedly stated, the States in America are choosing (and will be forced to choose) which path they are going to take: the road to freedom or tyranny? Some will choose the path of truth and freedom. Others will choose the path of manipulation, lies and slavery. And so the principles of limited government may be able to thrive once again in those states that choose freedom.

Let us get this straight at least: if we do not have a generation of people in the States that are willing to do what our founding generation did in securing freedom, then how dare we claim to love them, their ideas and what they attempted to bequeath to us. Just as in generations past, “it has grown the fashion to praise the men of former times but to deny their ideal of Independence.”[8] Praising our founders does nothing to preserve freedom.

To such a slothful attitude and philosophy, perhaps the following statement is appropriate: “Why, had we resigned without a struggle that which our ancestors encountered every danger to win, who would not have spit on you?”[9] Indeed, if our founding generation had the opportunity to spit on us, it is doubtful that they would find it worth their time to indulge us so.

It is past time that the people of these States get a grip of reality concerning the “course of human affairs,” in which we live. It is time that men become men, who are willing to both live and die for freedom. Quit pandering and cowering to these manipulations and threats perpetuated by anti-freedomists. Insist that your state legislators, governors and sheriffs uphold their oath to the Constitution by resisting unconstitutional federal actions. In truth, insist that your state and county officials (and candidates) implement and resurrect the second amendment as it was designed: TO PROTECT YOUR “FREE STATE”!


1, CNN Wire Staff, Militia Arrests Timed To Prevent Violence, CNN News, (March 31, 2010)
2, United States Constitution, Second Amendment.
3, Hannis Taylor, The Origin and Growth of the American Constitution, (Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1911), 232–233.
4, Kate Mason Rowland and General Fitzhugh Lee, intro., The Life of George Mason, 1725–1792, vol. 2, (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1802), 409.
5, Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Paper 26.
6, CNN Wire Staff, Militia Arrests Timed To Prevent Violence, CNN News, (March 31, 2010)
7, Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, Missouri MIAC Documents Scandal Leads to Advisory on SPLC & ADL, (March 26, 2009)
8, Terence MacSwiney, Principles of Freedom, (New York, NY, E.P. Dutton & Co., 1921), 242.
9, Terence MacSwiney, Principles of Freedom, (New York, NY, E.P. Dutton & Co., 1921), 239.

© 2010 Timothy N. Baldwin, JD – All Rights Reserved

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

Timothy Baldwin is an attorney from Pensacola, FL, who received his bachelor of arts degree at the University of West Florida and who graduated from Cumberland School of Law at Samford University in Birmingham, AL. After having received his Juris Doctorate degree from Cumberland School of Law, Baldwin became a Felony Prosecutor in the 1st District of Florida. In 2006, he started his own law practice, where he created specialized legal services entirely for property management companies.

Like his father, Chuck Baldwin, Timothy Baldwin is an astute writer of cutting-edge political articles, which he posts on his website, Baldwin is also the author of the soon-to-be-released book entitled, Freedom For A Change, in which Baldwin expounds the fundamental principles of freedom believed by America’s forefathers and gives inspiring and intelligent application of those principles to our current political and cultural standing.

Baldwin is involved in important state sovereignty movement issues, including being co-counsel in the federal litigation in Montana involving the Firearms Freedom Act, the likes of which is undoubtedly a pivotal and essential ingredient to restoring freedom and federalism in the states of America. Baldwin is also a member of freedom organizations, such as The Oath-Keepers, and believes that the times require all freedom-loving Americans to educate, invigorate and activate the principles of freedom within the States of America for ourselves and our posterity.

Web site: LibertyDefenseLeague



Posted: 04/05/2010 by Lynn Dartez in Christian

By Chuck Baldwin
March 31, 2010

Yesterday, The Wall Street Journal carried a story entitled “Obama Steps Up Confrontation.” It said in part, “On Thursday, the president challenged Republicans who planned to campaign on repealing his health-care bill with, ‘Go for it.’ Two days later, he made 15 senior appointments without Senate consent, including a union lawyer whose nomination had been blocked by a filibuster.

“At a bill-signing event Tuesday, he is set to laud passage of higher-education legislation that was approved despite Republican objections through a parliamentary maneuver that neutralized the party’s filibuster threat.”

Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) called Obama’s decision to federalize most student loans “really brazen” and “the most underreported, biggest Washington takeover in history.”

See the WSJ report here.

If history teaches us anything, it teaches us that power always craves more power. And there are only 2 ways to check power: internally, through self-discipline and humility; or externally, through equally determined and equipped counterforces.

Americans should thank God that George Washington was our first President, because no one exemplified self-discipline and humility more than he did. After having led the colonies to perhaps the most miraculous revolution in world history, Washington was universally adored and even idolized. There were many that even attempted to make Washington America’s king. He flatly refused this proposal, of course. (Compare Washington’s character and humility to former President G.W. Bush, who, on this subject, said, “If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I’m the dictator.”)

The concept of an American monarch may seem foreign to us today, but remember that a monarchy was the only form of government the colonists had ever known. And there can be no doubt that a monarchy (or some form of it) has been the single most popular form of central government that the nations of the world have utilized. But remember, too, the theme of America’s War for Independence was “No King But Jesus.” And no one believed that more than General George Washington did.

Like most of America’s founders, Washington distrusted government in general and despised big government in particular–even though people were willing to make him government’s imperial ruler. Listen to the Father of our Country:

“Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”

Unfortunately, there hasn’t been a man of George Washington’s caliber in the White House for many a moon. Instead of distrusting and limiting the central government, the vast majority of modern Presidents have completely ignored the constitutional role of the Presidency, and have sought to expand the authority of the executive branch of the federal government to proportions never allowed in the Constitution or envisioned by its creators. And Barack Obama is following the example of his predecessors by continuing this malevolent model (with increased rapidity, I might add). The above-mentioned stories are just the latest examples of what is fast becoming an imperial Presidency. It seems that every day another example of executive arrogance and usurpation of power takes place.

Given the lack of genuine humility and character of America’s President–and the unwillingness of Congress and the Supreme Court to restrain his unconstitutional propensities–it is left to the states and the People to hold this would-be king in check.

And here is another reason to be thankful for America’s founders: they recognized the ultimate role of the states in safeguarding and protecting liberty. As James Madison said in Federalist 45, “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.”


In Federalist 39 Madison said, “Each State, in ratifying the Constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act. In this relation, then, the new Constitution will, if established, be a FEDERAL, and not a NATIONAL constitution.” (Emphasis in the original.)

If America’s founders desired that a national–or monarchal–government be established in the United States, what was the purpose of the original 13 colonies retaining individual statehood? Why would each State retain its authority as “a sovereign body,” if not to serve as a vanguard against the encroachment upon liberty by the central government?

And never has liberty been more vulnerable to oppression and tyranny than right now! Why? Because ever since 9/11, both political parties in Washington, D.C., have placed America in a state of perpetual war. This fact alone puts the federal government in a position to become America’s oppressor.

In the first place, the Congress of the United States (then controlled by Republicans) abdicated its constitutional obligation to be the sole determiner regarding America’s entrance into war by providing then-President Bush with virtually unlimited and unchecked ability to determine and wage war clearly outside the perimeter of constitutional authority. And since taking over the federal government last year, Democrats in Washington, D.C., have followed suit.

But listen to Madison: “The executive [President] has no right, in any case, to decide the question, whether there is or is not cause for declaring war.”

Furthermore, the condition of unending, perpetual war only serves the purpose of lessening liberty. To quote Madison again: “No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.” Madison also declared, “If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.” And one more from Madison: “The means of defense against foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home.”

One needs to only look around to observe that Madison’s warnings are quickly becoming a reality in these United States.

What all this means is that the American people cannot rely on Washington, D.C., to control itself. We cannot trust Washington politicians and bureaucrats to have the character and self-discipline to honor the Constitution and defend our liberties. If we are to preserve our freedom in this country, it will be up to the body politic in each State to do it. If the Congress and Court in Washington, D.C., will not rein in this burgeoning monarchy at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, then the states and People must.

At this point, I do not believe there is any way to avoid it: a showdown between freedom-loving states and the federal government is inevitable. But not only is it inevitable, it is absolutely necessary! The central government in Washington, D.C., is quickly morphing into a monarchy–or at the very least an oligarchy. And neither the Donkeys nor the Elephants inside the Beltway are willing to do anything to stop it.

Either the states determine to defend the rights and liberties of the American people now, or we are destined to be governed by DC’s despots. Furthermore, we cannot cede to the US Supreme Court–or to any other federal authority–our independence, and most certainly, those fundamental elements necessary to our very survival. Only the states and the People, respectively, can maintain these bulwarks.

The question is, Will my State raise the “Don’t Tread On Me” flag and sincerely defend my liberties? And the follow-up question is, If my State will not do it, which states will, and what will I do? We have little choice. Either we join with a State that will fight for our liberties and help procure freedom for our posterity, or we follow radical unionists (and globalists) into a modern-day monarchy that is marching America toward oppression and servitude.

*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link.

© 2010 Chuck Baldwin – All Rights Reserved

Chuck Baldwin is Founder-Pastor of Crossroads Baptist Church in Pensacola, Florida. In 1985 the church was recognized by President Ronald Reagan for its unusual growth and influence.

Dr. Baldwin is the host of a lively, hard-hitting syndicated radio talk show on the Genesis Communications Network called, “Chuck Baldwin Live” This is a daily, one hour long call-in show in which Dr. Baldwin addresses current event topics from a conservative Christian point of view. Pastor Baldwin writes weekly articles on the internet and newspapers.

To learn more about his radio talk show please visit his web site at: When responding, please include your name, city and state.


Dear Concerned Press at Nevada Appeal:

I am sure that you are all dedicated to reporting your local news with absolute honesty and that you endeavor to inform your readers of the truth of what is happening in the world around them. Assuming this is true, I feel it necessary to give you some more information about what is really happening with your state capitol.

Please understand that the title of the article, “Capitol locked down in wake of threats” is inaccurate in precise representation of the truth. It is true that the capitol was locked down because of “letters” sent to the governor. However, the “letter” received by all 50 governors is actually a Declaration from a lawful Grand Jury of 26 people in each state which is endeavoring to re-establish the true Republic in a peaceful and lawful manner. It does not represent a “threat” from an “extremist” (as is commonly associated with “terrorist” in the media today) group but instead it is a real, legally binding document which is presented by a Grand Jury of regular people which declares that the governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, controller and treasurer all must have lawful oaths of office in order operate in their respective positions. The bonds which they all operate under have been effectively seized and noticed to be null and void. The package includes the following; Declaration, Warrants, Orders to the Governors, General orders to the military. It is not a threat, it is a truth that must be complied with or there will be consequences, not of violence, but legal recourse.

There is much to learn and understand about what is contained in the package that was received at the Capitol on Monday. I have included some sources below to help you understand who and what is behind the lock down. Please do the right thing by investigatin thoroughly what is happening and do not just listen to one party. Misinformation is rampant in our country. Please do not make yourselves a part of the problem.

A De Jure Grand jury made up of 26 Nevada Republic citizens are committed to re-establishing a De Jure government in your state please investigate the veracity of what they are going to do. It is a news story in progress and there will be more odd things happening in your Capitol…

What is happening is a peaceful effort to restore America to its rightful state. I am sure many in your state will be happy to hear the good news. Be the first to give it to them.


D Merlin Campbell



– Ending foreclosure and bank collection actions immediately (our

first and seventh directives)

– Ending tax prosecutions immediately (second and sixth directives)

– Ending invasions, prosecutions and detentions for fictitious crimes

against the state that lack an injured party other than insurrection,

treason and frauds against the United States (third and eighth


– Ending molestation on the byways (fourth and ninth directives)

– Production of sovereign identification and passports that do not

proclaim subject-class citizenship (fourth and ninth directives)

– Restoration of the trappings of proper de jure governance (fifth and

tenth directives)

– Restoration of the common law of the Land (third and eighth directives)

– Reigning in of the admiralty color-of-law venue to the high seas

(third and eighth directives)

– Restoration of the proper de jure judicial institutions such as the

district court of the United States and the one supreme Court as

constructed and restrained in the Constitution for the United States

of America, c. 1787 (Phase 2, thirteenth through fifteenth directives)

– Re-absorption of the de facto judicial aberrations such as USDC into

the de jure institutions (Phase 2, thirteenth through fifteenth



CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS beginning with voiding of the Downes v.

Bidwell monstrosity (Phase 2, eighteenth directive)

– Arrest and shackling of the District Court of the District of

Columbia (Phase 2, sixteenth directive)

– Recognition of sovereign status in the police databanks of the land

(fourth and ninth directives)

– A lawful and orderly removal of the corporate state as the ruler of

every aspect of your life.

All to be accomplished – with your help – BEHIND THE SCENES, lawfully,

peacefully, without violence and without risking civil war.


(can be reviewed in less than 30 minutes).

Please Goggle or use the included links:

– “28 USC 3002” (definition of the United States as a Federal

corporation never taught in civics class; go to paragraph 15)

(—-000-.html )

– “27 CFR 72.11” (U.S. Inc. defines all crime as commercial as a

result of the fall of the republic when the South walked out of

congress in 1861 and the de jure congress, unable to raise a quorum,

was replaced by Lincoln with the de facto corporate Congress; and the

de jure district court of the United States was replaced by the de


( )

– “Executive Order 6102” (government’s confiscation of your family’s

gold and wealth under threat of 10 years in prison for failure to

comply. As the Order specifies U.S. “persons” (eg. JOHN SMITH and

JANE DOE), law enforcement was duped into enforcing against the

general public a command that only applied to Federal employees and

members of the armed forces.)

( or )

– “HJR 192” (outlawing of the simple act of “paying with money” as a

felony by substituting the lawyer’s parlor trick of “discharging”

debts) ( or

– “Congressman Louis McFadden speech” (indictment of the Secretary of

the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board of Governor’s for treason

by the chairman of the House Banking and Currency committee in 1934.

In scathing speeches to Congress, McFadden said: “(The Fed) has

impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has

bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government.”

This most knowledgeable man on banking also explained in vivid detail

the method for recruiting the Federal Reserve to pay our debts as

holder of the gold, and which is at the heart of today’s “tax

remedies.”) (



– “Lewis v. United States 680” (Federal Reserve Bank is privately

owned: “…we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal

instrumentalities for purposes of the FTCA (Federal Tort Claims Act),

but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled

corporations.” Lewis v United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1982).

In other words, the Fed enjoys no United States immunity from law suit

because it is a Federal institution in name only.

( and

– “Modern Money Mechanics” (The Fed’s concise operational manual

showing how money AND INTENTIONAL INFLATION are created from thin air

by the Fed and it’s member banks. The manual is very clear as to the

power of created inflation to speed the process of confiscating your

wealth. The section: “Who Creates Money?” and the final paragraph in

“Bank Deposits – How They Expand or Contract” are worth extra

attention.) ( or )

– “Grace Commission” (Confirmed that virtually ALL taxes actually go

to the Federal Reserve Bank to pay interest on the U.S. debt to the

banking families that own the International Monetary Fund (IMF): “With

two-thirds of everyone’s personal income taxes wasted or not

collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by

interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions

to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax

revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which

taxpayers expect from their Government.” J. Peter Grace, Cover

letter, President’s Private Sector Report on Cost Control, January 12,

1984. Peter Grace was considered the Warren Buffett of his time, and

the Grace Commission Report received widespread media attention as the

gospel of Reagan’s so-called tax system overhaul.)

( or )

– “31 CFR 103.11” (Promissory note is defined as a “monetary

instrument:” “(u) Monetary instruments…Monetary instruments

include…All negotiable instruments (including personal checks,

business checks, official bank checks, cashier’s checks, third-party

checks, promissory notes (as that term is defined in the Uniform

Commercial Code), and money orders) that are either in bearer form,

endorsed without restriction, made out to a fictitious payee (for the

purposes of Sec. 103.23), or otherwise in such form that title thereto

passes upon delivery.”)

( or

– “NYUCC 3-104” (Promissory note is defined as a “negotiable

instrument:” “(1) Any writing to be a negotiable instrument within

this Article must (a) be signed by the maker or drawer; and (b)

contain an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain

in money and no other promise, order, obligation or power given by

the maker or drawer except as authorized by this Article; and (c)

be payable on demand or at a definite time; and (d) be payable to

order or to bearer. (2) A writing which complies with the

requirements of this section is (a) a “draft” (“bill of exchange”) if

it is an order; (b) a “check” if it is a draft drawn on a bank and

payable on demand; (c) a “certificate of deposit” if it is an

acknowledgment by a bank of receipt of money with an engagement to

repay it; (d) a “note” if it is a promise other than a

certificate of deposit.) (

– “Senate Report 93-549” (The United States has been under

dictatorial control since March 9, 1933. Report of the Special

Committee on the Termination of the National Emergency, Senate Report

93-549, War and Emergency Powers Acts, November 19, 1973. “Foreward:

Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared

national emergency…These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of

Federal law. These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President

extraordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which

affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing

manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough

authority to rule the country without reference to normal

Constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these

statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the

means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad;

institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and

communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict

travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of

all American citizens.”)

( )

– “Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281 (1949).” (U.S.

regulations apply only within the U.S. territories and the District of

Columbia. “It is a well established principle of law that all federal

regulation applies only within the territorial jurisdiction of the

United States unless a contrary intent appears.”)

– “Caha v. US, 152 U.S. 211 (1894)” (U.S. regulations apply only

within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “The laws

of Congress in respect to those matters [outside of Constitutionally

delegated powers] do not extend into the territorial limits of the

states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other

places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national


– “U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222.” (U.S. regulations apply only

within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “There is a

canon of legislative construction which teaches Congress that, unless

a contrary intent appears [legislation] is meant to apply only within

the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”)

– “Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901).” (Purportedly decided if

the constitution applies to U.S. territories. In actuality, unleashed

the great fraud of unlimited statutory power misapplied throughout the

continental united States of America. Dissenting opinion of Justice

Marshall Harlan. “…two national governments, one to be maintained

under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be

maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument,

by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed

to…a radical and mischievous change in our system of government will

result…We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional

liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of

legislative absolutism…It will be an evil day for American liberty if

the theory of a government outside the supreme law of the land finds

lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence.” In other words, a

genuine de jure united States of America congress is always bound to

enact laws within the jurisdiction of the constitution. He held tyo

the obvious truth that congress does not exist, let alone have powers,

outside the constitution. Harlan said, “This nation is under the

control of a written constitution, the supreme law of the land and the

only source of the powers which our government, or any branch or

officer of it, may exert at any time or at any place.”)

– Section 802, Patriot Act. (Defining the People as terrorists.

Defining terrorism as a maritime event. Excluding private meetings on

the land from terrorism: “(5) the term `domestic terrorism’ means

activities that–(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a

violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

(B) appear to be intended– (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian

population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by

intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a

government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C)

occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United

States.”) (