Archive for the ‘Oath Keeperrs’ Category

Advertisements

ATF knocking doors of recent firearms purchasers

CITIZEN MILITIA ARRESTS POLICE

Armed Citizen Militia Shows Up At Occupy Phoenix Alex Jones’ Infowars There’s a war on for your mind!

AMERICAN MILITIAMAN WARNS CONGRESS TO BACK OFF!

Steven Seagal Tells All New World Order

American Militia Timeline

EVERYONE NEEDS TO SEE THIS : OBAMA’S DRONES WAR ON WOMEN AND CHILDREN!

b-small
There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights.”- Marine General Smedley Butler.

Oath Keepers has launched a national effort to recall (or remove by any other lawful means) all of the oath breaking members of Congress, in both the House and Senate, who voted for the National Defense Appropriations Act of 2012 (NDAA), which contains provisions that authorize indefinite military detention and trial by military commission of “any person” – including U.S. citizens and lawful residents – upon the mere say-so of the President or one of his subordinates in the Executive Branch, such as within the Department of Defense or CIA.

Number three on the Oath Keepers list of Orders We Will Not Obey states:

3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to military tribunal.

That is near the top of our list for very good reason – this claimed power will kill our Bill of Rights unless it is stopped.  To be blunt, we consider the NDAA of 2012 to be a declaration of war on the American people, and an act of treason.   But even if you disagree with that view, and merely consider those who voted for it to be oath breakers, please work hard to remove them all from office.  Oath Keepers members across the nation will lead or assist efforts in their states to remove any member of Congress, regardless of party, who voted for this monstrosity.

We encourage all Americans of whatever political party to set aside their differences and come together in defense of our Bill of Rights by rooting out this den of vipers in Washington D.C. who are either knowingly killing our Bill of Rights, were too concerned with their careers to take a principled stand by voting against the NDAA, or are useful idiots who don’t understand what they swore an oath to defend.  Whatever their excuse, they have violated their oaths to defend the Constitution and must be sent packing.  This is not about politics.  This is about defending the Constitution.  As Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes put it:

These politicians from both parties betrayed our trust, and violated the oath they took to defend the Constitution.  It’s not about the left or right, it’s about our Bill of Rights. Without the Bill of Rights, there is no America.  It is the Crown Jewel of our Constitution, and the high-water mark of Western Civilization.

 

As two time Medal of Honor winner Marine General Smedley Butler once said “There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights.”   Time to fight.

This is a bi-partisan assault on the Bill of Rights that will require a bi-partisan defense.  We the People must adopt a scorched-earth policy against all who voted for the NDAA of 2012, regardless of party, using any and all lawful means available to remove them from office.  If you can remove them by means of recall, then do so.  If that option is not available in your state, consider working to make it an option in your state.  If attempts to recall are stopped by the courts, then root the oath breakers out in the next primary of whatever party they are in, making this issue the litmus test and supporting a challenger who will pledge to repeal this dangerous law.   Make this desecration of our Bill of Rights campaign issue number one.

And if you don’t manage to root them out in the primary, then defeat them in the general election, again supporting a challenger who pledges to repeal the detention provisions of the NDAA.   Use whatever lawful means or combination of strategies available to get the job done.   And even when any particular method “fails,” it still succeeds in keeping the focus on this act of betrayal, and it serves to educate the American people, waking them up to the ongoing bipartisan assault on our Bill of Rights.  Even if we lose a battle we can still win the war.

We must keep this issue in the public eye, and keep the pressure on.  Just as Jefferson and Madison were successful in rallying opposition to the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, which clearly violated the Constitution, and used that opposition to sweep the Federalists from Congress in what was known as “the revolution of 1800,” we must rally opposition to this clearly unconstitutional act and use it to sweep all of the Bill of Rights killing career politicians, of both major parties, out of Congress.   Clean them all out!
Continue reading and comment at Oath Keepers: http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/12/25/oath-keepers-launches-national-effort-to-recall-andor-remove-members-of-congress-who-voted-for-ndaa-military-detention-merry-christmas-u-s-congress/

Florida

This guy is great.

I can’t wait to meet him … this is the type of “missing link” that we have needed for years. Barack, my name is Grady Warren, and I am an angry White man!

WARREN: Barack, you’re in a fight you will not win. Because you have underestimated how many millions of Americans love this country and have lost loved ones for these United States.

You have declared war on the white man in America — putting the wants and needs of moochers, leeches, looters, and criminals ahead of the producers, and the workers of America. And we don’t want 15 to 20 million illiterate Mexicans and Chicanos as our new welfare society, living like rats in our neighborhoods.

They must go, and either the government steps up, or the government will have to clean up. They will not stay and get citizenship for breaking the law.

Barack, you, your advisers, pollsters, pundits, talking heads, have wanted to know: Who are the pissed-off people in this country? Well, the pissed-off people, sir, are the white people. It’s the white people, stupid.

Amen!

<object style=”height: 390px; width: 640px”><param name=”movie” value=”http://www.youtube.com/v/KDAodiAfi6U?version=3″><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”><param name=”allowScriptAccess” value=”always”></object>

ARGUES IN KERCHNER VS. OBAMA APPELLEE BRIEF THAT U.S. CONSTITUTION IS NOT THE LAW OF THE LAND

Legal Analysis by John Charlton

From the American Revolution to today, there has been an intimate bond between our armed forces and the very political notion of liberty upon which our independence and Republic are founded.

(March 9, 2010) — Many U.S. Citizens have not awakened to the fact that the U.S.A. is no longer a Constitutional Republic, but a tyrannical state, overthrown from the very day Chief Justice Roberts administered the oath of office to the ineligible candidate, Barack Hussein Obama II.

Those in denial of this bitter political reality need look no further for the evidence of the paradigm shift in the minds of lawyers for the U.S. Department of Justice than the opposition brief filed by Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Paul J. Fishman, U.S. Attorney, and Mark B. Stern and Eric Fleisig-Green, of the Appellate Staff Division of the DoJ, before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Kerchner et al. vs. Obama & Congress.

The core of the Department of Justice’s argument manifests in the clearest terms that they no longer hold the U.S. Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, but rather consider it merely as a theoretical construct, the violation of which harms no one in particular, on pp. 9-10 (Bold Face added):

Plaintiffs suggest that their injuries are analogous to those of states affected by global warming or individuals injured by government displays of religion. See Pl. Br. 39 (citing cases). But none of plaintiffs’ cited cases suggests that a mere interest in the proper application of the law, unaccompanied by more concrete consequences particular to a plaintiff, can serve as the basis of Article III standing. See, e.g., Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497, 517 (2007) (reinforcing that under Article III “a litigant must demonstrate that it has suffered a concrete and particularized injury that is either actual or imminent”); Suhre v. Haywood County, 131 F.3d 1083, 1086 (4th Cir. 1997) (“[A] mere abstract objection to unconstitutional conduct is not sufficient to confer standing.”) (cited at Pl. Br. 39).

As a sworn upholder of the Constitution, Commander Kerchner is no longer a private citizen-per-se, but a Constitutional officer who is bound to uphold the Supreme Law of the Land against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Considering that Obama holds foreign citizenship and has used his claim to U.S. Citizenship to enter into an office for which he is not eligible by the mere fact of holding British Citizenship from birth (cf. our article, 4 Supreme Court Cases define “natural born citizen” ), he is rightly considered both a foreign and a domestic enemy of the U.S. Constitution.

Considering that Commander Kerchner is duty-bound to defend the Constitution against such an enemy, his case and his appeal are perfectly lawful, right, and just, and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has  a constitutional duty to hear the appeal and overturn the anarchical decision of Judge Jerome B. Simandle, who dismissed the case.

Furthermore, Kerchner, in being forced to accept an ineligible Commander-in-Chief by the action of the Joint Session of Congress on January 8, 2009 when they selected an ineligible candidate to be U.S. President, is harmed directly and most intimately in his adhesion to the very Armed Forces which is duty-bound to uphold that Constitution.

If the violation of the U.S. Constitution’s explicit, facial obligations for holding the office of the U.S. President is a crime which harms no one in particular and which thus presents no basis for a judicial review, then the Republic has been overthrown by the Chicago Mob, and there is no recourse left but ballots and armed counter-revolution.

By claiming such violation is no grounds for a case in Federal Court, the Department of Justice has publicly admitted that it accepts a political theory of usurpation and tyranny whereby a small coterie of individuals, controlling both parties, can overthrow the constitutional order of our Republic and nullify any constitutional restriction as long as they, and they alone, are unanimous in their action.

In other words, the Department of Justice has just confessed and admitted a theory of dictatorship of the few over the democratic rule by the People.  And that is the Politics of Tyrants.

The Third Circuit Court would be well-advised to consider that without a U.S. Armed Forces bound to a constitutionally eligible and respectful Commander-in-Chief, once they refuse to uphold the rights of members of the U.S. Military to contest the claims of such an illegitimate commander, they expose themselves to become the next victims of the use of such military force against the other branches of government:  for if you render the military oath of no force or value before your court, you have declared that the armed forces are no longer are bound to uphold the U.S. Constitution in any term or obligation which that document declares.

It’s a simple choice then:  the Constitution or tyranny; liberty or death!



United States of America

THE MINUTEMAN PROJECT


INVASION USA


Ricardo Dominguez with his Transborder Immigrant Tool (photo: CALIT2)

Illegal aliens crossing the U.S.-Mexico border now have a cell-phone tool to chart the best route, find food and locate people who will help them enter the country � courtesy of a professor at a state-funded university.

Ricardo Dominguez, a University of California, San Diego tenured visual arts professor and activist, designed the Transborder Immigrant Tool, an application much like a global-positioning system used in cars, to help illegals find the best locations for food, water and groups to assist them as they sneak into America.

Dominguez is also co-founder of the Electronic Disturbance Theater, or EDT, a group that developed virtual-sit-in technologies in 1998 in solidarity with the Zapatista communities in Chiapas, Mexico. He also helped set up a website-jamming network called the FloodNet system to attack official sites of the U.S. Border Patrol, White House, G8, Mexican embassy and others.

“It allowed anyone with Internet access to overload the websites of several governmental entities,” he told Vice Magazine.

Dominguez also called for a three-day virtual sit-in on the Minuteman Project website in 2005, targeting it with denial-of-service attacks, according to an account in “Tactical Media.”

Dominguez said his research lab at the California Institute for Telecommunications & Information Technology, or CALIT2, on the UCSD campus is called BANG Lab, which stands for Bits, Atoms, Neurons and Genes. He said he’s been focusing on developing “border-disturbance technologies.”

To create the Transborder Immigrant Tool, Dominguez used a Motorola i455 cell phone, which includes a free GPS applet.

“We were able to crack it and create a simple compass-like navigation system,” he explained. “We were also able to add other information, like where to find water left by the Border Angels, where to find Quaker help centers that will wrap your feet, how far you are from the highway � things to make the application really benefit individuals who are crossing the border.”

Dominguez told the North County Times, “The primary goal of the tool is to offer those crossing a way not to die.”

But Jim Gilchrist, founder and president of the Minuteman Project, told WND the tool goes a step further.

“It helps illegals avoid all of the Border Patrol hot spots,” he said. “It helps them to illegally infiltrate the United States.”

Gilchrist said Dominguez is aiding and abetting people who break the law.

“What he’s doing is not developing something to put in a cell phone to summon 9-1-1 in case they’re stuck in the desert and in trouble and they need help,” he said. “He’s providing them a detailed, mapped pathway into the United States so illegals can bring in their drugs, anchor babies, illegal alien cargo, armaments and anyone who wants to come into the United States, regardless of our rule of law. That’s what this professor is doing. He should be indicted.”

He continued, “This is serious. What is next? Someone using that to get someone in the United States to kill a member of law enforcement or a bunch of kids at an elementary school in the name of some god or some culture from the anti-American mantra? Who knows what the consequences could be?”

Messages left with Dominguez had not been returned at the time of this report.

According to the BANG blog, the Transborder Immigrant Tool was the winner of “Transnational Communities Award” and was funded by CALIT2 and two awards from the UCSD Center for the Humanities.

Dominguez said he has plans to “interface with communities south of the border,” including nongovernmental organizations, churches and communities that deal with people who are preparing to illegally cross the border.

“How can we train them to use this? What is the proper methodology? Those are really going to be the most nuanced and difficult elements with, let’s call it, the sociological aspect of the project,” he said.


Jim Gilchrist, founder and president of the Minuteman Project, poses in front of Ronald Reagan sketch

Border Patrol spokesman Mark Endicott said smugglers have used GPS devices in the past, and the application won’t hinder law enforcement efforts, the Associated Press reported. But Gilchrist disagrees with that assessment.

“Yes, it will,” he said. “It’s going to be another tool of encouragement to come to the United States. It’ll tell them this nation is no longer a nation of laws; it’s a nation of mob rule as far as our immigration laws are concerned. Just come on over, and we’re going to help you.”

Asked what other projects he is working on, Dominguez told Vice Magazine, “We’ve got a lab where we’re working with similar applications using nanotechnology and labs where we teach researchers about electronic civil disobedience and border-disturbance technologies.”

He said UCSD graduate students recently completed a project in which they installed a Skype system on a pay phone near the border in Tijuana, Mexico. The students direct illegals to the free pay phone when Homeland Security drops them off on the Mexico side of the border.

Also featured on the BANG lab website are Dominguez’ fellow UCSD researchers, Elle Mehrmand and Micha Cardenas. Cardenas is described as “a transgender artist” and lecturer in the visual arts department at UCSD. Mehrmand and Cardenas have participated in several demonstrations called “Techn�sexual” in Tijuana, San Francisco and Montreal where the two engage in erotic acts on a stage and use biometric sensor devices to amplify their heartbeats before a live audience.

As for the Transborder Immigrant Tool, Dominguez has said he hopes to make it available for free on the Internet.

Gilchrist questioned where Dominguez’ loyalties lie.

“What is a real American? Is it someone who hates America and encourages lawlessness? Is that an American?” he asked. “I don’t think he’s an American at all. I think he’s an anarchist.”

He added, “Instead of Dominguez saying, ‘You should not be breaking U.S. laws. I am an American. I respect the rule of law in my country, and I encourage you to stay in Mexico and Central America,’ he’s just saying, ‘Come on over. May the rule of law be damned.'”